✧*。٩(ˊᗜˋ*)و✧*。 白麓的 web-log

On Collision

Today when teaching mechanics, I suddenly realise that many students aren't aware of the elegancy of describing a collision in the centre of mass frame.

Centre of Mass Frame

Energy, kinetic and potential, is a frame-dependent quantity. It is overlooked by most high-school mechanics textbook that

ELab=ECOM+Erel,

where ELab represents the kinetic energy in the laboratory frame, ECOM the centre of mass frame and Erel the energy of centre of mass.

We can prove the result inductively by proving a two-particle case: Let two particle m1 and m2 moving at v1 and v2. By differentiating the definition of centre of mass, it is not hard to find

V=m1v1+m2v2m1+m2.

Thus, v1=m2m1+m2(v2v1) and v2=m1m1+m2(v1v2) are the relative velocities of the two particle in the COM frame. Plug in these result:

Erel=12(m+M)V2=12(m1v1+m2v2)2m1+m2,ECOM=12m1m2m1+m2(v2v1)2

The second relationship requires a bit of simplification that can be easily done given the highly symmetric form. Obviously, the sum of the above yields the kinetic energy in the laboratory frame.

Collision

The coefficient of restitution is defined as the ratio of "departing speed" by "approaching speed". This definition, imo is somewhat vague, as it tells nothing concrete about the collision.

e=v1v2u1u2.

It is really noteworthy that the term v1v2 is actually quite obvious in the expression ECOM above, that should explain why people would use the relative speed of the two particles to measure the elasiticity of the collision. For it is now obvious that

Et=e2Ei.

That is, e2 is the ratio of energy retained in the COM frame. Since we cannot create energy in collision, thus e1. Similarly, it is impossible to create "negative" kinetic energy, thus e0.

Energy Loss

Notice that

Ekin=12p2m.

Due to the conservation of momentum, we understand that the kinetic enery of centre of mass is preserved during the collision. All energy loss in a collision are attributed to the (1e2)ECOM.

#"hs-maths"